<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title> &#187; Bing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whiteinkblog.com/tag/bing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whiteinkblog.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 19:03:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Bing: The Necessity of Mutual Response</title>
		<link>http://www.whiteinkblog.com/2009/06/04/bing-the-necessity-of-mutual-response/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiteinkblog.com/2009/06/04/bing-the-necessity-of-mutual-response/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 03:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Youssef Sarhan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design Deconstructed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Typography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiteinkblog.com/?p=586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There has be an over-whelming amount of negative reviews and responses on the new bing logo. Giving a solid critique is important, but even more so the ability to respond to these remarks. From what I have experienced bing is a new service from Microsoft, it aims to be a Decision Engine, to help you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There has be an over-whelming amount of negative reviews and responses on the new <a href="http://www.bing.com">bing</a> logo. Giving a solid critique is important, but even more so the ability to respond to these remarks. From what I have experienced <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/emea/presscentre/pressreleases/ProductLaunchPR_280509.mspx">bing is a new</a> service from Microsoft, it aims to be a <a href="http://www.decisionengine.com/Default.html">Decision Engine</a>, to help you make decisions no less. The current logo is brutal, it&#8217;s flimsy, doesn&#8217;t command any authority nor is it inviting or reliable. It is a highly amateur looking result and a week after it&#8217;s release it already looks dated. If Microsoft don&#8217;t do something about how they approaching this whole endeavor I guarantee that this will be the usual Microsoft situation, a year from now it will be failing and wont live up to the expectations. It is essential that they rethink their strategy and listen to what the public are saying. Here is the current logo, beside it my proposal, or at least a step in the right direction.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.whiteinkblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/bingsbs.jpg"><img src="http://www.whiteinkblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/bingsbs.jpg" alt="Current Bing Logo &#038; Proposal" title="bingsbs" width="680" height="298" class="size-full wp-image-591" /></a></p>
<p>The bing logo really oozes of basic lack of type optics. Look at how the n gets so narrow and thin at the apex. The g sits off the baseline with a half loop that doesn&#8217;t link up, not that it <em>must</em>, but in this case it looks too awkward. The counters are ludicrously huge and the descenders don&#8217;t rise near high enough to forgive such a huge x-height. Large x-heights are good for reading, but with a low cap you&#8217;re shooting yourself in the foot. </p>
<p>It will need more work but what I have done, I have done well when compared to the current state of affiars. I have paid attention to the letterforms and the space around them, the weight, contrast and the flow, something that wasn&#8217;t done the first time around. I&#8217;d advise the folks at Microsoft to get a typographer/foundry to design a custom face; or at least the four letters, or even use a typeface that already exists? Microsoft&#8217;s reluctance to pay for typeface licenses in the past render that unlikely. e.g. <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F691weEVpwc">The Helvetica/Arial Story</a>.</p>
<p><span id="more-586"></span>Here are some more images,</p>
<p><a href="http://www.whiteinkblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/bingreplace.jpg"><img src="http://www.whiteinkblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/bingreplace-1024x786.jpg" alt="bingreplace" title="bingreplace" width="1024" height="786" class="alignnone size-large wp-image-590" /></a></p>
<p>Integrated on the website without much obstruction or effort and it looks quite acceptable. Of course you could argue a total redesign of the site is needed but it is the logo I&#8217;m focusing on more than user interface.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.whiteinkblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/bingscaled.jpg"><img src="http://www.whiteinkblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/bingscaled-729x1024.jpg" alt="bingscaled" title="bingscaled" width="729" height="1024" class="alignnone size-large wp-image-592" /></a></p>
<p>Bing logotype at different sizes.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.whiteinkblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/bingspecisim1.jpg"><img src="http://www.whiteinkblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/bingspecisim1.jpg" alt="bingspecisim" title="bingspecisim" width="1000" height="622" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-593" /></a></p>
<p>The logo is based on Chaparral Pro Semi bold Italic, above.</p>
<p>I would be exaggerating slightly to say I am content or even close to finished with this, however it is more of a suggestion of what I envision, a step in a better direction. It is in it&#8217;s early stages but already we can see an improvement. Over the coming weeks I hope to develop this further, rather than just making it acceptable or a step in the right direction I&#8217;d like to make it something more than that, something with character that is memorable. If anyone is interested in advising me on it or even offering feedback or constructive criticism I&#8217;m open for suggestions.</p>
<p>You can follow me on twitter for regular updates or if you&#8217;d like to get in touch, chat or network.<br />
<a href="http://twitter.com/YoussefSarhan">Follow Youssef Sarhan on Twitter</a>, email me at <a href="mailto:contact@whiteinkblog.com">contact@whiteinkblog.com</a> or leave a reply comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiteinkblog.com/2009/06/04/bing-the-necessity-of-mutual-response/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
